Bolt gives NYT moral lecture over their moral lecture

This article was originally posted on Rich Uncle Rupert in 2017. It is presented here without editing or modification from the version which was published.

Andrew Bolt, a News Corp columnist whom the courts have found repeatedly to be a liar, has given his opinion on an opinion piece by A. Odysseus Patrick published in the New York Times that called the Australian government’s apparent preference for Syrian Christians as immoral as it leaves non-Christians (regardless of religion) to die a violent and painful death. Of course, if Bolt had actually read the lede paragraph of the piece, he would know that author was saying that the fact that Christians are being given preference over non-Christians is immoral. Not the fact that 78% of the refugees are Christian.


Australia, like much of the Western world, agreed soon after World War II to care for refugees in the 1951 Refugee Convention without regard or distinction based on race or religion. Despite this, some members of the government — most notably Immigration Minister Peter Dutton has gone on the record to say that it was a “mistake” for previous governments to accept Lebanese Muslim refugees.

In his blog post, of which only 38% of the words are his own bona-fide original expression, he states that he hopes that none of the 5,662 non-Christian refugees selected by the United Nations are allowed to resettle in Australia.

Of course, it is unconstitutional for the federal government to prohibit religious practice and it could easily be argued before the High Court that preferencing refugees of one religion over another constitutes such prohibition.

Opinion of the editor

Without reading any of his other blog posts, it seems that Bolt genuinely believes that Christians are the most persecuted group in the Syrian conflict. (The comments seem to suggest this). While it is indisputable that Christians are being persecuted and their plight should not be ignored, it is simply dishonest to suggest that they are the biggest victims. Muslims, especially Shia and non-denominational Muslims, face (in terms of the number of casualties) far more violence. However, no comparison between the victims of this war should matter because ultimately no group of people is safe from the violence. It doesn’t seem to matter what religion or race a person is: if they are in Syria, they are a target.

Of course, Bolt doesn’t seem to care care. I’m told that’s his schtick.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *